bosswin168 slot gacor 2023
situs slot online
slot online
situs judi online
boswin168 slot online
agen slot bosswin168
bosswin168
slot bosswin168
mabar69
mabar69 slot online
mabar69 slot online
bosswin168
ronin86
ronin86
ronin86
ronin86
ronin86
ronin86
ronin86
ronin86
cocol77
ronin86
cocol77
cocol77
https://wowcamera.info/
mabar69
mahjong69
mahjong69
mahjong69
mabar69
master38
master38
master38
cocol88
bosswin168
mabar69
MASTER38 MASTER38 MASTER38 MASTER38 BOSSWIN168 BOSSWIN168 BOSSWIN168 BOSSWIN168 BOSSWIN168 COCOL88 COCOL88 COCOL88 COCOL88 MABAR69 MABAR69 MABAR69 MABAR69 MABAR69 MABAR69 MABAR69 MAHJONG69 MAHJONG69 MAHJONG69 MAHJONG69 RONIN86 RONIN86 RONIN86 RONIN86 RONIN86 RONIN86 RONIN86 RONIN86 ZONA69 ZONA69 ZONA69 NOBAR69 ROYAL38 ROYAL38 ROYAL38 ROYAL38 ROYAL38 ROYAL38 ROYAL38 ROYAL38
SLOT GACOR HARI INI SLOT GACOR HARI INI

Man wins $300k payout after being wrongly jailed for six nights

Man wins $300k payout after being wrongly jailed for six nights
0 0
Read Time:2 Minute, 1 Second

A man jailed for seven days through a gross miscarriage of justice will receive more than $300,000 in damages after successfully suing the judge who imprisoned him.

Judge Salvatore Vasta will be liable to personally pay part of the compensation offered to the Brisbane man, known only by the pseudonym Mr Stradford.

The father-of-two was jailed in December 2018 for a minimum of six months for not obeying orders to provide financial documents during divorce proceedings.

Watch the latest news and stream for free on 7plus >>

The sentence was overturned, and the man was released after six nights following an appeals court’s strong criticism of the decision to jail him.

On Wednesday, a Federal Court judge also blasted Judge Vasta’s serious errors in imprisoning Stradford as he ordered the $309,500 in damages.

“The applicant in this proceeding was the victim of a gross miscarriage of justice,” Justice Michael Wigney said in his ruling.

Judge Salvatore Vasta (centre) will be liable to pay some of the compensation to a man he jailed. Credit: AAP

“He was detained and imprisoned for contempt following what could fairly be described as little more than a parody of a court hearing.”

Vasta, a Federal Circuit Court judge, made “a number of fundamental and egregious errors” in jailing the man for contempt without first finding that he had failed to comply with the court’s orders.

“He erroneously believed that another judge had made that finding, though exactly how he could sensibly have arrived at that position in the circumstances somewhat beggars belief,” Wigney said.

The court found Vasta could not rely on judicial immunity to protect himself from paying damages because he had acted outside his jurisdiction in imprisoning Stradford.

“His Honour acted without or in excess of jurisdiction in the requisite sense,” Wigney said.

“There was no proper foundation in law for the making of the imprisonment order.”

The Commonwealth and Queensland were found to be vicariously liable for Stradford’s imprisonment and ordered to also pay part of the compensation for an ordeal that left the Brisbane man with PTSD and major depressive disorder.

Ford recalls thousands of cars over potentially deadly defect

Woman dies after accidentally setting herself alight at bus stop

If you’d like to view this content, please adjust your Cookie Settings.

To find out more about how we use cookies, please see our Cookie Guide.

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %